ABSTRACT
Background: This study's objective was to analyse the fear of COVID-19 among the dentistry student and the knowledge, attitude, and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: It was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. An online survey form was designed and distributed to undergraduate dental students via google forms. A previously validated fear of coronavirus scale (FCV-19S) was used to analyse the fear. SPSS 21 was used for data entry and data analysis. Descriptive statistics were applied to calculate the frequencies of different variables. Independent t-test was executed to determine the difference of FCV-19S among gender and between public and private dental colleges. ANOVA was carried out to evaluate the difference in fear among different levels of BDS. Results: Data of 983 individuals from different dental colleges in Karachi, Pakistan, have been analysed. The majority of the students were females in 1st year and private sector dental colleges (P<0.001). The mean FCV-19S was 20.99 +or- 6.48, which is higher than the cut-off value 15. A highly significant difference in mean FCV-19S among the different variables has been observed (P<0.001). A significant difference has been observed among the gender (t (932) = -5.40, p<0.001) in all 4-years of BDS. Conclusion: Despite good knowledge and following the COVID-19 guidelines, fear is prevalent among the students.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has served as a stark reminder of the importance of foundational public health training for all physicians. However, the most effective way to incorporate these concepts into undergraduate medical education remains unclear. Here, we characterize the literature regarding the effectiveness of public health integration into undergraduate medical education in North America. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for North American peer-reviewed literature, published from 01/01/2000 to 30/08/2021, that described outcomes of integrating public health training within an undergraduate medical curriculum. Results were qualitatively synthesized into key themes. A total of 38 studies, involving interventions across 43 medical schools, were included. Studies reported on a combination of public (n=13), global (n=9), population (n=9), community (n=6), and epidemiological (n=1) health interventions, and either implemented one-off workshops, electives, or international experiences (n=19); a longitudinal theme or long-term enrichment pathway (n=14); or a case-based learning curriculum (n=8). The majority (81.5%, 31/38) of integrations were self-described as successful and, of studies reporting on feasibility, most (94.1%, 16/17) were indicated as feasible. The definition of what constituted such success, however, was unclear. Innovative examples included the use of simulation workshops and mobile-optimized media content. Key challenges were noted, however, in securing adequate funding and buy-in from administrative leadership. Robust community partnerships and iterative cycles of implementation of the intervention were critical factors to success. In summary, foundational public health components can be effectively integrated into medical school curricula and would benefit from adequate resourcing, innovation, community partnerships, and continuous improvement.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Genetic and Developmental Disorders Case Report Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 12:15 pm - 01:15 pm INTRODUCTION: Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is one of the more common hematologic disorders. Many individuals are asymptomatic until a triggering event. Events that lead to hemolysis in the setting of G6PD include certain medications, infections, and specific foods. We discuss a case of G6PD deficiency diagnosed in a hospitalized adult with COVID infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41 year old male presented to the hospital with altered mental status. On admission he was found to be in diabetic ketoacidosis and was COVID positive. He was admitted to the ICU and his acidosis was corrected with insulin. He did not require intubation but was treated with steroids, remdesivir, and supplemental oxygen for his COVID pneumonia. His hospitalization was complicated by hemolytic anemia. Testing for autoimmune hemolytic anemia and HIT (heparin induced thrombocytopenia) were negative. Genetic testing for G6PD deficiency came back positive. The patient was discharged and referred to hematology for follow up. DISCUSSION: Interestingly, our patient was asymptomatic prior to his COVID infection. It is likely that the stress from his COVID infection triggered worsening hemolysis. G6PD can be worsened with specific medications or foods but we cannot exclude infection. The inflammatory response secondary to COVID is the probable cause for the patient's hemolytic anemia presentation and subsequent G6PD deficiency diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: G6PD deficiency should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with COVID infection and labs consistent with hemolytic anemia. Reference #1: Buinitskaya Y, Gurinovich R, Wlodaver CG, Kastsiuchenka S. Centrality of G6PD in COVID-19: The Biochemical Rationale and Clinical Implications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:584112. Published 2020 Oct 22. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.584112 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Sarin Atam No relevant relationships by Kathleen Coppola No relevant relationships by Malik Muhammad Uzair Khan No relevant relationships by Mackenzie Kramer No relevant relationships by Rameesha Mehreen No relevant relationships by Stephanie Tzarnas No relevant relationships by Laura Walters
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: COVID-19 Co-Infections SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 1:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) related respiratory tract infections have been described in critically ill or immunocompromised patients. We present a case of HSV-1 pneumonia in a mechanically ventilated and immunocompromised patient in the setting of SARS CoV-2 infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old female on Rituximab for Rheumatoid arthritis presented with shortness of breath and cough. She was afebrile, tachypneic and hypoxic. She was discharged 1 week prior after a 3 weeklong treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia. CT Angiogram showed extensive bilateral patchy consolidations with ground-glass infiltrates and subsegmental pulmonary emboli. Patient was initiated on heparin and broad-spectrum IV antibiotics with steroids for presumed ARDS with superimposed bacterial pneumonia. Her respiratory failure worsened requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Failing oxygenation despite aggressive therapy prompted further workup that showed a normal echo and negative blood cultures. Sputum was negative for Pneumocystis pneumonia and Tuberculosis. Cytology from tracheal aspirate showed bronchial cells with inclusions and multinucleations consistent with HSV-associated cytopathic changes. A positive serum HSV-1 IgG and serum quantitative PCR of HSV-1 DNA solidified the diagnosis. Ganciclovir therapy was initiated to cover for HSV and Cytomegalovirus (CMV), however, a serum CMV PCR was negative. Within a day, her clinical course took a downward spiral. CT chest was repeated which showed worsening airspace disease. Despite ganciclovir therapy, the severity of lung disease led to eventual failure of oxygenation and patient demise. DISCUSSION: Prolonged mechanical ventilation due to ARDS is a risk factor for HSV bronchopneumonia in patients with COVID-19 and has shown an increased mortality 1,2. Diagnosis can be achieved by viral culture or observing cytopathic effects of HSV on cells in tracheobronchial aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, or biopsy3. In critically ill patients early treatment has been shown to prolong the ICU time to death and improved oxygenation4. It is important to test for co-infections as about 65% of HSV pneumonia cases are associated with pathogens like CMV and Pneumocystis5. CONCLUSIONS: Worsening respiratory disease in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients despite antibiotic therapy for suspected superimposed bacterial infection warrants a workup for secondary viral infections like HSV. Increased mortality is seen if not promptly treated. Reference #1: 1. Meyer A, Buetti N, Houhou-Fidouh N, et al. HSV-1 reactivation is associated with an increased risk of mortality and pneumonia in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Critical Care. 2021/12/06 2021;25(1):417. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03843-8 Reference #2: Le Balc'h P, Pinceaux K, Pronier C, Seguin P, Tadié J-M, Reizine F. Herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus reactivations among severe COVID-19 patients. Critical Care. 2020/08/28 2020;24(1):530. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03252-3 Reference #3: Shah JN, Chemaly RF. Herpes Simplex Virus Pneumonia in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Pulmonary Involvement in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. 2010:301-311. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15742-4_24 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Andrew Cox No relevant relationships by Syeda Hassan No relevant relationships by Maria Khan No relevant relationships by Malik Muhammad Uzair Khan No relevant relationships by Rameesha Mehreen No relevant relationships by Rahat Ahmed Memon No relevant relationships by Ifrah Naeem No relevant relationships by Laura Walters
ABSTRACT
Started in late 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly turned into a global pandemic. Considering there is no proven therapy for COVID-19 infection, there is a need to propose potential treatment options. The use of convalescent plasma is one such option as convalescent plasma has previously been used for treating outbreaks of Ebola, influenza, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and severe acute respiratory (SAR) viruses. Therefore, we carried out an early systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy and its effects on COVID-19 patient outcomes. A structured and rigorous systematic review was carried out that included all studies conducted on this topic between December 2019 and June 2020. A total of 10 studies containing a mix of case reports, case series, observational studies, and randomized control trials were identified. Most of the studies lacked randomization and included only small groups of patients. Considering the limitations in the design of current studies, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion. However, our results showed that plasma therapy produces notable improvements in patients' clinical symptoms and radiological and biochemical parameters associated with COVID-19 infection. Based on the available information, it is difficult to draw a tangible conclusion about whether plasma therapy improves patient mortality. Until we have concrete evidence to prove otherwise, convalescent plasma therapy may be used as adjuvant therapy for treating COVID-19 infection in critically ill patients.
ABSTRACT
During a disease pandemic, there is still a requirement to perform postmortem examinations within the context of legal considerations. The management of the dead from COVID-19 should not impede the medicolegal investigation of the death where required by the authorities and legislation but additional health and safety precautions should be adopted for the necessary postmortem procedures. The authors have therefore used the craniotomy box in an innovative way to enable a safe alternative for skull and brain removal procedures on suspected or confirmed COVID-19 bodies. The craniotomy box technique was tested on a confirmed COVID-19 positive body where a full postmortem examination was performed by a team of highly trained personnel in a negative pressure Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) autopsy suite in the National Institute of Forensic Medicine (IPFN) Malaysia. This craniotomy box is a custom-made transparent plastic box with five walls but without a floor. Two circular holes were made in one wall for the placement of arms in order to perform the skull opening procedure. A swab to detect the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was taken from the interior surface of the craniotomy box after the procedure. The result from the test using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) proved that an additional barrier provided respiratory protection by containing the aerosols generated from the skull opening procedure. This innovation ensures procedures performed inside this craniotomy box are safe for postmortem personnel performing high risk autopsies during pandemics.